Abdi, R., Tavangar, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1669–1679.

Abdi, R.  (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 139-145.

Amoglobeli, G. (2017). Types of political discourses and their classification. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region,3(1), 18-24.

Bantawig, R. (2019). The role of discourse markers in the speeches of selected Asian presidents. Heliyon, 5(3), 21–38.

Candlin, C., & Hyland, K. (1999). Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. London: Longman, 99-121.

Capadevila, R.  (2008). It's not racist. It's common sense: A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 1-16.

Chen, W. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s inaugural speech from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), 966-982.

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M.  (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71.

Curren,V., Kirby, F., Parsons, E., & Lockyer, J. (2003). Discourse analysis of computer mediated conferences in world wide web-based continuing medical education. The Journal of Computer-assisted Education, 23, 222-238.

Dafouz, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal MDMs in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1), 95-113.

Esmer, E. (2017). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in Turkish election rally speeches. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 367-384.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 5(11), 121-138.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Psychology Press.

Gibson, G. (2012). ‘I’m not a war monger but…’: Discourse analysis and social psychological peace research. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 159-173.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.  (2003). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K.  (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hoffman, H. (1995). The Triumph of Propaganda: Film and National Socialism. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL text books, Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21-44.

 Hyland, K. (1998a). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. TEXT, 18(3), 349-82.

Hyland, K. (1998b). Exploring corporate rhetoric: metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-45.

Hyland, K. (1998c). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-55.

Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge.  Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 241-67.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2002). Academic argument: Induction or interaction? Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses, 44, 29-45.

 Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and Invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. New York: CUP.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133-51.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

 Hyland, K. (2005a). A Convincing Argument: Corpus Analysis and Academic Persuasion.  Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 6(2). 110-123.

 Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29.

Hyland, K. & Milton, J. (1997).  Hedging in L1 and L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-206.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–77.

Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Ilie, C. (2000). Cliché‐based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. International journal of applied linguistics, 10(1), 65-84.

Jacobs, N. (2001). Information technology in scholarly communication: A discourse analysis. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1112-1133.

Jalilifar, A. & Savaedi, Y. (2012). They want to eradicate the nation: A cross-linguistic study of the attitudinal language of presidential campaign speeches in the USA and Iran. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 4(2), 59-96.

Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought pattern in intercultural communication. Journal of Language Learning, 1, 1–20.

 Koutsantoni, D. (2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 19-36.

Mahzari, A. & Maftoon, P.  (2007). A contrastive study of the introduction section of English and Persian medical research articles. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 1 (3), 201-214.

Maier, P. (1992). Politeness strategies in business letters by native and nonnative English speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 189-205.

Marandi,S. (2002). Contrastive EAP rhetoric: Metadiscourse in Persian vs. English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tehran.

 Markos, M. (2006). Interaction and Persuasion: An analysis of the use of rhetorical devices in Gordon Brown's speech to the Labour Party Conference. Unpublished Thesis, Dalarna university.

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D.  (2003). Working with discourse. London: Continuum.

 Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3-22.

Mc Laren, P. & Mills, A. (Date?) I’d like to thank the academy: An analysis of awards discourse at the Atlantic school of business. The journal of Administrative Science, 25, 307-316.

Nickerson, C.  (1993). A Comparative Study of Business Letters Written by Native and Non-Native speakers. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Panayirci, U. C. & Isleri, E. (2014). A content analysis of the AKP's “Honorable” foreign policy discourse: The nexus of domestic–international politics, Turkish studies, 15 (1). 97-106.

Peterlin, A. P. (2005). Text-organizing metatext in research articles: An English-Slovene contrastive analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 307-319.

Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.

Roth,W. & Lucas, K. (1996). From truth to invented reality: A discourse analysis of high school Phsycs student’s talk about science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 145-179.

Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

Schäffner. C. (1997). Discourse and politics. A Multidiciplinary Introduction, 2, 206-30.

Schiffrin, D.  (1980). Metatalk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction, 50, 199-236.

Sheppard, S. (2009). What oaths meant to the framers’ generation: A preliminary sketch. Cardozo L. Rev. De Novo, 209, 273–283.

Siami, T. & Abdi, R. (2012). Metadiscourse strategies in Persian research articles: Implications for teaching writing English articles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 4(9), 165-176.

 Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 359-374.

 Swales, J.  (1990). Genre analysis: English for Specific Purposes in Academic and Research Setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tashi, T. (2018). An analysis of interactional metadiscourse in public speaking: A case study in English speeches of the prime minister of Bhutan. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 38-60.

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78.

 Thompson, G., & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. TEXT, 15(1), 103-27.

Van Dijk, T., Ting Toomy, S., Smitherman, G., & Troutman, D. (1997). Discourse, Ethnicity, Culture, and Racism', in Teun A. van Dijk (ed), Discourse as Social Action. London: Sage.

Yazadani, S. & Sharifi,S. (2016). Interactional metadiscourse in English and Persian news articles about 9/11. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 424-438.

Zand Moghadddam, A., & Bikineh, L. (2014). Discourse markers in Political interviews: A contrastive study of Persian and English. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 3(2), 27-60.