Original article | Innovational Research in ELT 2022, Vol. 3(2) 1-11
pp. 1 - 11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2022.505.1 | Manu. Number: MANU-2209-24-0002.R2
Published online: December 31, 2022 | Number of Views: 38 | Number of Download: 295
This paper conducts a descriptive content analysis of the articles written on English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and published in TR Dizin from 2000 to 2021. A total of 23 ESP articles have been analyzed. Analyzing the articles written on ESP provides a fruitful opportunity for the researchers studying ESP. This study fulfills this gap by analyzing the ESP article published in TR Dizin from 2000 to 2021 as a replication of the research conducted by Gül and Sözbilir. According to the findings, the majority of ESP research papers were written by one author, handled by Turkish affiliations, published in IOJET, written in English, done with the Faculty of Medicine, used descriptive and survey research designs, Likert scale as a tool, done with undergraduate students with a sample size of 31 to 100, and displayed in frequency and percentage tables. Finally, the results of the paper were analyzed by showing the findings with frequency and percentage tables via SPSS Statistics 21.0.
Keywords: ESP, research paper, descriptive content analysis, research methods and techniques
|How to Cite this Article?|
APA 6th edition
Chicago 16th edition
Aimoldina, A, & Zharkynbekova, S. (2014). Kazakistan üniversiteleri ESP derslerinde iş mektuplari yazmada özgün modelleri birleştirme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 16-33.
Akbaş, R. (2021). A Systematic Review of the ESP (English for Specific Purposes)-based post-graduate research in Turkey. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(22), 369-387.
Akbulut, F. D. (2016). ESP needs analysis of university preparatory school students: Learning-centred approach. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(36), 181-202.
Akın, G. (2011). Polis Akademisi öğrencileri için andragojik ilkelere göre geliştirilmiş problem temelli mesleki İngilizce eğitimi programının etkililiği. Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 115-136.
Aktaş, N. B, & Doyran F. (2017). Curriculum development based on students’ language needs at a vocational high school. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 1-16.
Aslan E. Ş, Özkan N, Özkan Ş, & Değer M. (2019). Duygusal satış vaadi (ESP): Duygu çekiciliğinin marka itibarına etkisi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 7(3), 1492-1511.
Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Bayram, İ. & Canaran Ö. (2020). Identifying the perceived professional development needs of English for specific purposes (ESP) teachers. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19(3), 1647-1659. Doi: doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2020.734559
Belcher, D., Johns, A. M. & Paltridge, B. (2011). New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bercuci, L. & Chitez M. (2019). A Corpus Analysis of Argumentative Structures in ESP Writing. IOJET, 6(4), 733-747.
Canaran, Ö., Bayram, .İ, & Altuğ, Ç. (2020). English for specific purposes (ESP) program evaluation: Perspectives from three faculties. Başkent University Journal of Education, 7(1), 20-28.
Cheng, A. (2019). Examining the applied aspirations in the ESP genre analysis of published journal articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.005
Dinçay, T. (2010). Designing a learner-centered ESP course for adults based on evidence from a questionnaire and incorporating the learners’ aims into a situational-based syllabus. Dil Dergisi, 0(150), 7-20.
Elkiliç, G,, Bayrak, İ., & Parlak, E. (2003). The role of needs assessment in the developing ESP courses. Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11(1), 59 - 64.
Gökçe, A., & Batman, O. (2015). Needs assessment of English for occupational purposes (Eop) education in tourism associate degree programs based on students’ opinions. Paradoks Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 11, 211-264
Gollin-Kies, S. (2014). Methods reported in ESP research articles: A comparative survey of two leading journals. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.04.001
Gül, Ş., & Sozbilir, M. (2016). International Trends in Biology Education Research from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of papers in selected journals. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1363a
Gündüz, N. (2016). The scope and use of ESP in foreign and Turkish context. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(3), 647-669.
Hewings, M. (2002). A history of ESP through “English for specific purposes”. ESP World, 1(3).
Işık-Taş, E. E., & Kenny, N. (2019). Current Practices, challenges, and innovations in English for Specific Purposes instruction and research. English for Specific Purposes Instruction and Research, 1-8.
Kazar, S. G. & Mede E. (2015). Özel amaçli bir İngilizce programı'nda öğrencilerin öğrenme ve hedef ihtiyaçlari algilari. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(2), 479-498.
Keshtiarast, B. & Salesi, H. (2020). Investigating employing information communication technology for ESP learning: A case of Iranian EFL students’ attitudes. IOJET, 7(2), 23-45.
Kural, F. (2019). Evaluating fine arts students’ attitudes towards ongoing ESP programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1), 275-304. Doi: 10.14812/cufej.349411
Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175-181.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Richie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Master, P. (2005). Research in English for specific purposes. In E. Hinkel (Ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 99-116). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Özüdoğru, F. (2019). Investigation of self-determination theory in an ESP course. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 1079-1089.
Rudy, M., Kristina, D. & Tarjana, S. S. (2019). Measuring spoken vocabulary load on medical English students: A Learner Corpus Evaluation. IOJET, 6(4), 774-787.
Safia, B. & Ghania, O. (2020). An examination of reading strategies awareness among Algerian ESP students at the National Higher School for hydraulics. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1784-1802. Doi: 10.17263/jlls.851001
Şahinkarakaş, Ş. & Arifi, Q. (2007). The CEFR and the needs of the ESP students. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(34), 83-92.
Saygili, H. K. (2015). Fostering speaking strategies of ESP students via drama: Case Study. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 8-109.
Sozbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yasar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon & D. Jorde (eds.), The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in Europe (pp. 1-35). Rotterdam: Sense publishers.
Syaiful, S., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Marzulina, L., Astrid, A. & Tersta, F. W. (2019). Learning in the digital era: Science education students’ perception on the SNSS use in the context of English for specific course. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 18(3), 1069-1080. Doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.610143
Ulum, Ö. G. (2017). ESP Needs Analysis of public order police officers. IOJET, 4(1), 18-30.
Ulum, Ö. G. (2020). ESP needs analysis of Turkish learners of English in architecture. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0(18), 443-456. Doi: 10.29000/rumelide.706089
Winn, W. & Beck, K. (2018). How ESP pedagogy in international virtual collaboration contributes to the authenticity of the learning process: a case study. IOJET, 5(4), 1031-1038.
December 2022All Articles