|  e-ISSN: 2757-5772

Original article | Innovational Research in ELT 2021, Vol. 2(2) 1-21

ELT teachers’ research engagement: Perspectives from Turkey

İlknur Ülker Mermer & Özge Nilüfer Soyer

pp. 1 - 21   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2021.416.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2110-30-0002.R1

Published online: December 30, 2021  |   Number of Views: 54  |  Number of Download: 837


This study aims to investigate the perceptions of Turkish EFL (English as a Foreign Language) and ESL  (English as a Second Language) teachers about the concept of research. It attempts to explore the extent that they read and do research and the factors affecting why they do so. A quantitative study was conducted with 152 English language teachers teaching at various levels in Turkey through an online survey by employing the first convenience and then snowball sampling methods. The data were collected utilizing Borg’s (2009) English Language Teachers’ Views of Research survey and it was statistically analyzed by SPSS. The results indicated that teachers conceptualized research similar to a scientific notion of inquiry. They thought that good research should include teacher objectivity, which was found as the most important feature, hypothesis, experiments, variables, statistical analysis, a large number of participants. Furthermore, teachers also reported that lacking enough time and finding doing research not practical in a classroom setting were the most dominant factors that had a negative impact on their research engagement. However, the current study revealed that teachers do research for their professional development and to enhance their teaching techniques whereas lacking time and lacking interest in research emerged as the most significant obstacles for not doing research. 

Keywords: Teacher research, educational research, research engagement, English language teaching (ELT), teacher cognition

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Mermer, I.U. & Soyer, O.N. (2021). ELT teachers’ research engagement: Perspectives from Turkey . Innovational Research in ELT, 2(2), 1-21. doi: 10.29329/irelt.2021.416.1

Mermer, I. and Soyer, O. (2021). ELT teachers’ research engagement: Perspectives from Turkey . Innovational Research in ELT, 2(2), pp. 1-21.

Chicago 16th edition
Mermer, Ilknur Ulker and Ozge Nilufer Soyer (2021). "ELT teachers’ research engagement: Perspectives from Turkey ". Innovational Research in ELT 2 (2):1-21. doi:10.29329/irelt.2021.416.1.


    Allison, D. & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v24i2.139

    Altinsoy, E., & Birgün, M. (2016). Research engagement of Turkish ELT teachers. International Journal of Language Academy, 4(2), 111-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.392

    Arayssi, S. I., Bahous, R., Diab, R., & Nabhani, M. (2019). language teachers’ perceptions of practitioner research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 897-914. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2019-0076

    Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl053  

    Banegas, D. L. (2018). Towards understanding EFL teachers’ conceptions of research: findings from Argentina. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 20(1), 57-72.

    Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N. & Ugurlu, C.T. (2010). Teachers' views on educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(4), 1088-1093.

    Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

    Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007

    Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170  

    Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011

    Bulut, M. (2011). English language teachers’ perception of and engagement in research. Published Master Thesis, Trakya University, Edirne.

    Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Crookes, g (1993) Action research for second language teachers: going beyond teacher research, Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 130-144.

    Ekiz, D. (2006). Primary school teachers' attitudes toward educational research. educational sciences. Theory and Practice, 6(2). 395-402.

    Faribi, M., Derakhshan, A., & Robati, M. (2019). Iranian English language teachers’ conceptions towards research. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 2(2), 1-11. http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-558-en.html

    George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10th ed.). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Goodley, C. (2018). Reflecting on being an effective teacher in an age of measurement. Reflective Practices, 19, 167-178.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437401 

    Hair Jr, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.

    Hammersley, M. (2004). Action research: a contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education,30(2), 165–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000215502

    Hammersley, M. (2000). The relevance of qualitative research. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 393-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713688545

    Hoang, H. T. T. (2020). Vietnamese EFL teacher self-efficacy in practice. Retrieved from Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington’s Dissertations. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/9284 

    Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Korkut, P. , Karayel, H. , Postallı, S. & Ünlü, R. (2019). Pre-service English language teachers’ attitudes and their conceptions of research. Araştırma ve Deneyim Dergisi, 4 (1), 29-37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/adeder/issue/46840/587862

    Krumsvik, A. (2020). Norwegian EFL teachers´ beliefs about in-depth learning. Retrieved from The University of Bergen’s thesis archives. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/24090

    Kutlay, N. (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188-206. 

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.055

    Ling, L. Y. (2003). Underpinnings of teachers’ professional development-a new conceptualization of field experience. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 11-18.

    McDonough, J. & S. McDonough. (1990). ‘What’s the use of research?’ ELT Journal, 44(2): 102-9.

    McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 357-382.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500319065

    McNamara, O. (Ed.) (2002). Becoming an evidence-based practitioner. Routledge Falmer.

    Monette, D.R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R. (2005). Applied social research: A tool for the human services. Brooks/Cole.

    Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

    Nunan, D., David, N., & Swan, M. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

    Oancea, A. (2005). Criticisms of educational research: key topics and levels of analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 157-183.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192052000340198

    Rankin, J. & Becker, F. (2006). Does reading the research make a difference? A case study of teacher growth in FL German. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192052000340198  

    Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Shinde, M. B., & Karekatti, T. K. (2012). Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching English to Primary School Children. Online Submission, 5(1), 69-86.

    Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers' attitudes towards research: a challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559- 577.

    Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 103-114.

    Tavakoli, P. & Howard, M. (2012) Teaching English to speakers of other languages teachers’ views on the relationship between research and practice, European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 229-242, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643398

    Ulla, M. B. (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 797-810. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.864413560180216

    Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (1981). Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis. F.A. Davis Co.Wyatt, M. & Dikilitaş, K. (2016) English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university, Educational Action Research, 24(4), 550-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1076731