|  e-ISSN: 2757-5772

Original article | Innovational Research in ELT 2023, Vol. 4(1) 14-30

Evaluating an English Language Writing Course through Logic Model: Links between Outcomes and Activities

Pınar Koçer & Ece Zehir Topkaya

pp. 14 - 30   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2023.558.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2303-12-0002.R1

Published online: June 19, 2023  |   Number of Views: 92  |  Number of Download: 324


Abstract

A logic model can be used to present, understand, and evaluate the planned work and intended results of a program or a course.  Using the logic model as a tool, this study explored the outcomes and activities of a writing course in English for General Purposes (EGP) context at the tertiary level in Türkiye to clarify the links and potential gaps between course outcomes and activities. To this end, developing a study-specific logic model the study utilized a qualitative research design based on the data obtained through one-on-one and focus group interviews with the voluntary participation of ten students and two English language instructors.  Based on the analysis of the interview data, two logic models were developed reporting a number of course outcomes and activities with regards to the English Writing course offered at the tertiary level. Of these, 6 outcomes using linking words appropriately; enriching vocabulary; planning an outline; organizing ideas; achieving unity and coherence; writing different types of paragraphs and 5 related activities writing model essays; analyzing sample texts; making presentations; having weekly assignments; writing a review of a book were found to be the same on both models. The differences detected in the logic models, on the other hand, indicate a need to develop a comprehensive course content, in which specific outcomes and their links to the activities are more clarified.

Keywords: Writing in English, program evaluation, logic model


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kocer, P. & Topkaya, E.Z. (2023). Evaluating an English Language Writing Course through Logic Model: Links between Outcomes and Activities . Innovational Research in ELT, 4(1), 14-30. doi: 10.29329/irelt.2023.558.2

Harvard
Kocer, P. and Topkaya, E. (2023). Evaluating an English Language Writing Course through Logic Model: Links between Outcomes and Activities . Innovational Research in ELT, 4(1), pp. 14-30.

Chicago 16th edition
Kocer, Pinar and Ece Zehir Topkaya (2023). "Evaluating an English Language Writing Course through Logic Model: Links between Outcomes and Activities ". Innovational Research in ELT 4 (1):14-30. doi:10.29329/irelt.2023.558.2.

References

    Akcaoğlu, M. (2011). An Assessment of Academic Writing Needs of Graduate Students (Master Thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Akdemir, A. S., & Eyerci, A. (2016). Using Writing Templates as Materials to Improve Writing Skills in EFL Classes: An Experimental Study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(2), 747-756.

    Akyel, A. S., & Özek, Y. (2010). A language needs analysis research at an English medium university in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 969-975.

    Alagözlü, N. (2007). Critical Thinking and Voice in EFL Writing, Asian EFL Journal, 9 (3), pp. 118-136.

    Alharbi, M. A. (2019). EFL University Students' Voice on Challenges and Solution in Learning Academic Writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 577-588.

    Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes37, 88-103.

    Bundy, J., Vogel, R. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2018). Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal39(2), 476-501.

    Çelik, S. (2020). Building critical academic writing skills: the impact of instructor feedback on Turkish ELT graduate students. TESL-EJ, 24(3).

    Coşkun, A. (2011). Evaluation of the writing component of an English language teaching program at a public university: a case study [Ph.D. Doctoral Program]. Middle East Technical University.

    Coşkun, A. (2013). An investigation of the effectiveness of the modular general English language teaching preparatory program at a Turkish university. SA Journal of Education, 33(3).

    Creswell, J. & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th ed.) Thousands, Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Cumming, A. (2009). The Contribution of Studies of Foreign Language Writing to Research, Theories and Policies, (eds.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research, Part 2: Looking Ahead. Issues in Theory, Research and Pedagogy (s. 209-232).

    Dolgunsöz, E., Yıldırım, G., & Yıldırım, S. (2018). The effect of virtual reality on EFL writing performance. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 278-292.

    Dündar, E., & Merç, A. (2017). A critical review of research on curriculum development and evaluation in ELT. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2(1), 136-168.

    Ekmekçi, E. (2018). Exploring Turkish EFL Students’ Writing Anxiety. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1), 158-175.

    Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, A. İ. (2011). Writing Performance Relative to Writing Apprehension, Self-Efficacy in Writing, and Attitudes towards Writing: A Correlational Study in Turkish Tertiary-Level EFL. Asian EFL journal, 13 (1), 163-191.

    Eryilmaz, A. & Yesilyurt, Y. E. (2020). Foreign language writing as a developmental process (Foundation, expansion, development, and completion): The FEDCom model. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 307-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.768768

    Far, M. M. (2008). On the relationship between ESP & EGP: a general perspective. English for specific purposes and world, 1(17), 1-11.

    Goddard, P. (2003). Implementing and Evaluating a Writing Course for Psychology Majors. Teaching of Psychology, 30(1), 25-29.

    Hasman, M. A. (1994). Designing an EFL Curriculum: Steps in Assessing Needs. MEXTESOL Journal, 18(2), 33-40.

    Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.

    Hyland, K. (2003a). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Kırkgöz, Y., Çelik, S., & Arıkan, A. (2016). Laying the Theoretical and Practical Foundations for a New Elementary English Curriculum in Turkey: A Procedural Analysis. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), 1199-1212.

    Kurt, G., & Atay, D. (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1), 12-23.

    Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Maley, A. (2011). Squaring the circle – reconciling materials as constraint with materials as empowerment. B. Tomlinson, Materials development for language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Marić, I. (2013). Stakeholder analysis of higher education institutions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 11(2), 217-226.

    Martin, I., & Carey, J. (2014). Development of a Logic Model to Guide Evaluations of the ASCA National Model for School Counseling Programs. The Professional Counselor, 4(5), 455-466.

    McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your Program’s Performance Story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 1-14.

    Myles, J. (2002). Second Language Writing and Research: The Writing Process and Error Analysis in Student Texts. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 6(2), 1-19.

    Nam, J. M. (2005). Perceptions of Korean college students and teachers about communication-based English instruction: Evaluation of a college EFL curriculum in South Korea (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Nation, I. S., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Oxford: Routledge.

    Nguyen, H. T. T (2016). Macro and Micro Skills in Second Language Academic Writing: a study of Vietnamese learners of English (Thesis). Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    O’Connell, J. (2022). Using a logic model to evaluate rater training for EAP writing assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101160

    Owen, J. M. (2006). Program evaluation: forms and approaches (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Öztürk, H., & Çeçen, S. (2007). The Effects of Portfolio Keeping on Writing Anxiety of EFL Students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 218-236.

    Rea-Dickens, P., & Germain, K. (1998). Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching. London: Longman.

    Salma, U.  (2015). Problems and Practical Needs of Writing Skill in EFL Context: An

    Analysis of Iranian Students of Aligarh Muslim University, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20 (11), p. 74-76

    Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2005). The Logic Model: A Tool for Incorporating Theory in Development and Evaluation of Programs. Administration in Social Work, 29(2), 85-103.

    Simon, B., & Taylor, J. (2009). What is the value of course-specific learning goals? Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(2), 52-57.

    Stegemann, K. C., & Jaciw, A. P. (2018). Making It Logical: Implementation of Inclusive Education Using a Logic Model Framework. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal16(1), 3-18.

    Taylor-Powell, E., & Henert, E. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation.

    Tekin, M. (2015). Evaluation of a Preparatory School Program at a Public University in Turkey. The Journal of International Social Research, 8(36), 718-733.

    Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2017). The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for language learning. Wiley Blackwell Publication.

    Tunç, F. (2010). Evaluation of an English Language Teaching Program at a Public University Using CIPP Model (Unpublished MA Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

    Yağız, O.  (2009). The Academic Writing of Turkish Graduate Students in Social Sciences: Approaches, Processes, Needs and Challenges (Doctoral Dissertation). Atatürk University, Erzurum.

    Yildirim, B., & Zehir Topkaya, E. (2020). Clarificative evaluation of elementary level grammar program of a tertiary level preparatory class in Turkey. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 1-11.

    Yordanka, V. B. (2012). Developing writing skills in English as a foreign language. Some Practical Teaching Ideas. Retrieved from https://www.gestiopolis.com/developing-writing-skills-in-english-as-foreign-language/

    Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology30(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.860