Preservice EFL Teachers’ Reflectivity Levels on Evaluation Tasks Assigned During Practicum

Suna Çelik & Evrim Eveyik Aydın

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2023.623.2

Original article | Innovational Research in ELT 2023, Vol. 4(2) 17-27

Preservice EFL Teachers’ Reflectivity Levels on Evaluation Tasks Assigned During Practicum

Suna Çelik & Evrim Eveyik Aydın

pp. 17 - 27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2023.623.2 | Manu. Number: MANU-2309-26-0007.R1

Published online: December 30, 2023 | Number of Views: 40 | Number of Download: 497

Save PDF

Abstract

The study aims to determine the predominant level of reflection observed in different evaluation tasks assigned to preservice English language teachers during their practicum. It also investigates whether each participant’s reflectivity level varies based on the type of task. The data involves 207 reflective tasks from nine senior students in an ELT program at a foundation university in Istanbul, analysed using Taggart and Wilson’ Profile of Reflective Thinking rubric. The findings indicate that self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and weekly observation tasks primarily induce technical level reflection, while overall evaluation tasks with guiding questions encourage contextual and dialectical level reflections. Moreover, participants' reflectivity levels change depending on the type of reflective task. Five out of nine preservice teachers, who were initially more focused on technical reflections, exhibited an increase in dialectical and contextual level reflections in their overall evaluation reports. Recognizing this influence is crucial for designing effective teacher training programs that promote higher-level reflective thinking with effective tasks.

Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Sırasında Verilen Değerlendirme Görevlerinde Aday İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Yansıtma Düzeyleri

Özet: Bu çalışma, İngilizce Öğretmeni adaylarına öğretmenlik uygulamaları sırasında verilen farklı değerlendirme görevlerinde baskın olan yansıtma düzeyini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, her katılımcının yansıtma düzeyinin göreve bağlı olarak değişip değişmediğini araştırmaktadır. Çalışmanın verisi, bir vakıf üniversitesinin İngilizce Öğretmenliği Programında Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersine kayıtlı 9 son sınıf öğrencisinin yazdığı 207 adet değerlendirme görevidir, ve bu veriler, Taggart and Wilson’ın Yansıtıcı Düşünme Profili rubriği kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, öz-değerlendirme, akran değerlendirmesi ve haftalık gözlem görevlerinin çoğunlukla teknik düzeyde yansıtmaları teşvik ettiğini göstermektedir, ancak soru yönlendirmeli genel değerlendirme görevleri bağlamsal ve diyalektik düzeyde yansımaları teşvik etmektedir. Ayrıca, katılımcıların yansıtma düzeyleri yansıtıcı görev türüne bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Genellikle teknik yansımalar yapan beş katılımcının, genel değerlendirme raporlarında diyalektik ve bağlamsal düzeyde yansımalar yaptığı bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, daha yüksek düzeyde yansıtıcı düşünmeyi teşvik eden farklı değerlendirme görevleriyle etkili öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının tasarlanabilmesi için hayati öneme sahiptir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: lisans düzeyi öğretmen eğitimi, yansıtıcı görevler, yansıtıcı öğretim, İngilizce Öğretmenliği öğretmenlik uygulaması, aday İngilizce öğretmenleri

Keywords: Initial teacher education, reflective tasks, reflective teaching, practicum in ELT, EFL preservice teachers

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Celik, S. & Aydin, E.E. (2023). Preservice EFL Teachers’ Reflectivity Levels on Evaluation Tasks Assigned During Practicum . Innovational Research in ELT, 4(2), 17-27. doi: 10.29329/irelt.2023.623.2

Harvard
Celik, S. and Aydin, E. (2023). Preservice EFL Teachers’ Reflectivity Levels on Evaluation Tasks Assigned During Practicum . Innovational Research in ELT, 4(2), pp. 17-27.

Chicago 16th edition
Celik, Suna and Evrim Eveyik Aydin (2023). "Preservice EFL Teachers’ Reflectivity Levels on Evaluation Tasks Assigned During Practicum ". Innovational Research in ELT 4 (2):17-27. doi:10.29329/irelt.2023.623.2.

References

Armutcu, N., & Yaman, Ş. (2010). ELT PSTs’ teacher reflection through practicum. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.009
Clara, M., Mauri, T., Colomina, R. & Onrubia, J. (2019). Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: A case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576626
Clarke, M. (2004). Reflection: Journals and reflective questions: A strategy for professional
learning. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2004v29n2.2
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath and Company. Dymoke, S., & Harrison, J. (Eds). (2008). Reflective teaching and learning: A guide to professional issues for beginning secondary teachers. London: Sage. El-Dib, M. A. B. (2007). Levels of reflection in action research: An overview and an assessment tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.002 Ferraro, J. M. (2000). Reflective practice and professional development. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Griffin, M. L. (2003). Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940308274
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C. Wong, F.K.Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2001, April). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1935777/Linking_practice_and_theory_The_pedagogy_of_realistic_teacher_education
Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Langer, A. M. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Using learning journals in higher and continuing education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510220144824
Lee, H. J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers' reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 699-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.007
Lee, S. I. (2008). Fostering preservice reflection through response journals. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 117-139. Levin, B., & He, Y. (2008). Investigating the content and sources of teacher candidates’ personal practical theories (PPTs). Journal of Teacher Education, 59(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107310749
Loughran, J. J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: Routledge.
Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369804800305
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Moon, J. A. (2007). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge
Naghdipour, B., & Emeagwali. O. L. (2013). Assessing the level of reflective thinking in ELT Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 83, 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.052
Nurfaidah, S., Lengkanawati, N. S., & Sukyadi, D. (2017). Levels of reflection in EFL preservice teachers’ teaching journal. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6861 Parra, G. E. C. (2012.) The role of reflection during the first teaching experience of foreign language preservice teachers: An exploratory case study. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.715
Posner, G. J. (2005). Field experience: A guide to reflective teaching. White Plains, NY:Longman.
Russell, T. (2018). A teacher educator’s lessons learned from reflective practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1395852
Sewall, M. (2009). Transforming supervision: Using video elicitation to support preserviceteacher-directed reflective conversations. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 11-30.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books.
Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Tuncer, H., & Özkan, Y. (2018). A case study on assessing reflectivity levels of preservice language teachers through journals. Novitas-ROYAL, 12(2), 173-186.
Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7201_4
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179579
Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks: A resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeşilbursa, A. (2011). Reflection at the interface of theory and practice: An analysis of preservice English language teachers’ written reflections. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 36(3), 104-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.5 Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23-49.
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Volume 4 Issue 2

December 2023

All Articles