|  e-ISSN: 2757-5772

Original article | Innovational Research in ELT 2024, Vol. 5(1) 27-39

Supporting Every Learner: Investigating Gender Differences in Autonomy

Ali Kurt

pp. 27 - 39   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/irelt.2024.1045.3   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2403-07-0007.R2

Published online: June 30, 2024  |   Number of Views: 25  |  Number of Download: 299


Abstract

Autonomy in education, particularly within the English as a Second Language (ESL) context, has been widely recognized for enhancing self-directed learning and the ability to shape one’s own educational journey. This study compares the motivational differences between male and female ESL students, using a quantitative research design. A structured questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of 13 students who were enrolled in a pre-sessional English program at a private university in Istanbul, Turkey. The study revealed gender-specific differences in autonomy and motivational dynamics. Female students had a higher level of self-motivation and intrinsic interest and favored self-study with the mindset that English proficiency is a means to enhance job prospects. In contrast, male students demonstrated a preference for collaborative learning and systematic approaches, wherein they connected new knowledge to their existing understanding. Whereas both genders had a similar perception of the benefits of watching movies/series, females got more involved in optional homework and conversations with native speakers and demonstrated greater autonomy in self-assessment compared to males, who viewed the teacher as playing a more central role in the learning process. In conclusion, these findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of the complicated motivational dynamics unique to each gender in English language learning, which suggests the need for customized pedagogical approaches that facilitate inclusive learning environments, catering to the unique motivational needs of male and female students. 

Keywords: Autonomy, Intrinsic motivation, Motivational disparities, Gender differences, English language learning


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kurt, A. (2024). Supporting Every Learner: Investigating Gender Differences in Autonomy . Innovational Research in ELT, 5(1), 27-39. doi: 10.29329/irelt.2024.1045.3

Harvard
Kurt, A. (2024). Supporting Every Learner: Investigating Gender Differences in Autonomy . Innovational Research in ELT, 5(1), pp. 27-39.

Chicago 16th edition
Kurt, Ali (2024). "Supporting Every Learner: Investigating Gender Differences in Autonomy ". Innovational Research in ELT 5 (1):27-39. doi:10.29329/irelt.2024.1045.3.

References

    Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Longman.

    Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning. Language Teaching, 40(1)21-40.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958

    Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Longman.

    Boroomand, F. and Abusaeedi, A. A. R. (2013). A gender-based analysis of iranian efl learners' types of written errors. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2013.287

    Bozkurt, N., & Yalcin Arslan, F. (2018). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Syrian Refugee EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Readiness. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2018.3028

    Carson, L. (2006). Some adult refugees learning English in Ireland: The motivational role of goal-setting and the European Language Portfolio, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Trinity College Dublin. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.34449.86882

    Clement, R., Dörnyei, Z. & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44, 417-451. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01113.x

    Çoban, Z. (2002). Attitudes Towards Learner Autonomy in Gazi University and Yıldız Teknik University [Paper presentation]. International INGED Conference on Interchanges and Exchanges: Current Trends in ELT, METU, Ankara, Turkey.

    Cook, D.A., & Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50, 997 - 1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074

    Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy: From theory to classroom practice. Authentic.

    Derrick, M. G., & Carr, P. B. (2003). Facilitating and understanding autonomy in adult learners. New Horizons in Adult Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10162

    Dickinson, L. (1993). Talking shop: Aspects of autonomous learning, An interview with Leslie Dickinson. ELT Journal, 47(1), 330-341. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ474538

    Dong, H., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Influential factors for gender differences in l2 learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 947-955. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4385

    Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2005) The relationship between cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning: evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender. High Ability Studies, 16(2), 201–218.

    Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003, October 6). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales [Paper presentation]. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Columbus, 82-88.

    Gremmo, M., & Riley, P.F. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00002-2

    Grover, K., & Miller, M. T. (2014). Gender differences in self-directed learning practices among community members. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 23, 19-31.
    https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6728.2019.00011.8

    Fırat, M. (2016). Measuring the e-learning autonomy of distance education students. Open Praxis, 8(3), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.310

    Iflazoglu, A., & Hong, E. (2011). Homework motivation and preferences of Turkish students. Research Papers in Education, 27(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.529581

    Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Boshuizen, H., & Wiel, M. (2010). The challenge of self-directed and self-regulated learning in vocational education: A theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 415-440. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/the-challenge-of-self-directed-and-self-regulated-learning-in-voc

    Karimpour, S., Sayad, A., Taheri, M., & Sheibani, K. A. (2019). A gender difference in emotional intelligence and self-regulation learning strategies. Is it True? Novelty in Biomedicine, 2, 38-44. https://doi.org/10.22037/nbm.v7i2.20974

    Koçak, A. (2003). A study on learners’ readiness for autonomous learning of English as a foreign language. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University,Turkey.
    https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/13388

    Harvey M, & Land L (2017). Research methods for nurses and midwives: Theory and practice. Sage Publications Limited.

    Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.

    Jones, T., (2019). Re-Doing Research: Best Practices for Asking About Gender and Sexuality in Education Studies. Jones, T., Coll, L., van Leent, L. & Taylor, Y., (Eds). Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research. pp.185-230. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6

    Liu, H. (2005). Learner Autonomy: The role of mtivation in foreign language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1165-1174,   https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.02

    Michelene, T. H. C., & Wylie R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243, https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

    Naibert, N., & Barbera, J. (2022). Development and evaluation of a survey to measure student engagement at the activity level in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1410-1419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01145

    Orawiwatnakul, W., & Wichadee, S. (2017). Exploring autonomous learning capacity from a self‐regulated learning perspective using learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3138–3155. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12747

    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. Newburry House Publishers.

    Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2019). Exploring autonomous learning capacity from a self‐regulated learning perspective using learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3138–3155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12747

    Pariyanto, P. and Pradipta, B. (2020). Factors influencing an efl learner’s proficiency: an english teacher’s perspective. Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v2i2.3369

    Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

    Rothes, A., Lemos, M. S., & Gonçalves, T. (2017). Motivational profiles of adult learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616669588

    Sert, N. (2006). EFL student teachers' learning autonomy. The Asian EFL Journal, 8(2), 180-201. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/June_2006_EBook_editions.pdf

    Sotto, R. J. B. (2021). Collaborative learning in the 21st century teaching and learning landscape: Effects to students’ cognitive, affective and psychomotor dimensions. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation2(2), 136–152.  https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i2.3325

    Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first? Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 245-266.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr106oa

    Studenska, A. (2019). Gender, Education Level And Autonomous Learning Difficulty. In P. Besedová, N. Heinrichová, & J. Ondráková (Eds.), ICEEPSY 2019: Education and Educational Psychology, vol 72. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 707-720 Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.11.80

    Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centered classroom. ELT Journal, 47(1), 23-24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ459634

    Wang, S., & Zhan, H. (2010). Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Digital Storytelling. Information and Communication Technology Education, 6, 76-87. http://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2010040107 

    Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767

    Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford University Press.

    Yıldırım, R. (2013). The portfolio effect: Enhancing Turkish ELT student-teachers’ autonomy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 92-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n8.8